The Social Relations ColLABorative
  • Home
    • About Us
  • Current Projects
    • Aggression >
      • School Safety Project >
        • Participate
        • Participants
        • Parents
        • Resources
        • Findings from Year 1
        • Findings from Year 2
    • Intimate Relationships >
      • Friendly Advice
      • Online Dating Study
    • Intergroup Relations >
      • Intergroup Conflict Theory
    • Systematic Review of Replications
    • Resources for Study Participants
  • Research Findings
    • Publications
    • Presentations
    • In the News
  • Relating Results - A Blog

Self-Esteem or Self-Construal? Intimacy in Romantic Relationships

10/13/2017

0 Comments

 

Written by Hal Bronson

Low Self-Esteem’s Involvement in Relationships
​While in relationships, individuals often find themselves desiring to be closer to their partners. Behaviors, such as sharing emotions, engaging in intimacy, and providing support to one another, provide opportunities for partners to increase the closeness of their relationship, but these behaviors are risky because partners may react undesirably. Due to the risk involved in disclosing and forming such closeness in romantic relationships, individuals tend to avoid these behaviors when they feel as if they are likely to result in rejection (Baker & McNulty, 2013). Regarding the risk regulation model, individuals with low self-esteem (LSE) are more likely to expect rejection, so they often avoid behaviors that increase interdependence, while the opposite can be said of individuals with high self-esteem (HSE; Murray, Holmes, & Collins, 2006). However, according to Leary and colleagues’ (1995) sociometer theory, individuals with LSE are more likely to participate in behaviors that heighten their interdependence in relationships due to the goal of increasing relational value. Is self-esteem the key in relational intimacy, or does a different factor carry more weight in this process? 
Relational Self-Construal’s Involvement in Relationships
​Relational self-construal is the extent to which the self is defined independently of others or interdependently with others (Baker & McNulty, 2013). Individuals high in relational self-construal define themselves by their close relationships, while individuals low in relational self-construal define themselves by their independent qualities (Baker & McNulty, 2013). While LSE can be an indicator of interdependence, relational self-construal must be considered as well. It is possible that individuals with LSE who are lower in relational self-construal may be likely to avoid risky behaviors that increase interdependence in favor of self-protection. Meanwhile, individuals with LSE who are higher in relational self-construal may look to increase their connections in relationships. Baker and McNulty (2013) conducted six studies and discovered that individuals with LSE are dependent on relational self-construal to determine if they value self-protection or connection goals more. 
​In conclusion, HSE is frequently associated with positive traits, and LSE is shown to be associated with numerous psychological disorders and a factor in lowering romantic relationship satisfaction by instilling fear in individuals with LSE that they are undeserving of love (Branden, 1995). However, this does not necessarily mean that the only way that individuals with LSE can increase intimacy and satisfaction within their romantic relationships is by increasing their self-worth. While having HSE may seem incredibly beneficial, this research (Baker & McNulty, 2013) shows that relational self-construal may carry more weight as a factor in determining relational quality and leading to an increase in interdependence in relationships.  
​References
Baker, L. R., & Mcnulty, J. K. (2013). When low self-esteem encourages behaviors that risk rejection to increase interdependence: The role of relational self-construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 995-1018. doi: 10.1037/a0032137

Branden, N. (1995). The six pillars of self-esteem: The definitive work on self-esteem by the leading pioneer in the field. New York, NY: Bantam.

Leary, M. R., Tambor, E. S., Terdal, S. K., & Downs, D. L. (1995). Self-esteem as an interpersonal monitor: The sociometer hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 518–530. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.68.3.518

Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 641–666. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.641
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Dr. H. Colleen Sinclair

    Social Psychologist, Relationships Researcher,
    Science Enthusiast

    Ms. Chelsea Ellithorpe

    Lab Manager of the Social Relations Collaborative and Blog Editor

    Categories

    All
    Aggression
    Attraction
    Break Ups
    Bullying
    Clinical Psychology
    Counseling
    Gender Roles
    Intergroup Behavior
    Interracial Relationships
    Love
    Mental Health
    Music
    Prosocial Behavior
    Romantic Relationships
    Scientific Replication
    Social Rejection

    RSS Feed

Home
About Us
Contact
Research
​Join
Lab Members Only
Picture





​A division of the Social Science Research Center at Mississippi State University.

  • Home
    • About Us
  • Current Projects
    • Aggression >
      • School Safety Project >
        • Participate
        • Participants
        • Parents
        • Resources
        • Findings from Year 1
        • Findings from Year 2
    • Intimate Relationships >
      • Friendly Advice
      • Online Dating Study
    • Intergroup Relations >
      • Intergroup Conflict Theory
    • Systematic Review of Replications
    • Resources for Study Participants
  • Research Findings
    • Publications
    • Presentations
    • In the News
  • Relating Results - A Blog